Message246109
| Author | tim.peters |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Serge Anuchin, mark.dickinson, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, steven.daprano, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date | 2015-07-03.00:37:20 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1435883840.94.0.761307744949.issue24546@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Thanks for the legwork, Steven! So far it looks like a gcc bug when using -m32 (whether ints, longs and/or pointers are 4 or 8 bytes _should_ make no difference to anything in Jason Swails's C example). But it may be a red herring anyway: there's only one chance in 2**53 of getting a random.random() result equal to 1.-2.**-53 to begin with. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-07-03 00:37:21 | tim.peters | set | recipients: + tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, vstinner, steven.daprano, r.david.murray, skrah, serhiy.storchaka, Serge Anuchin |
| 2015-07-03 00:37:20 | tim.peters | set | messageid: <1435883840.94.0.761307744949.issue24546@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-07-03 00:37:20 | tim.peters | link | issue24546 messages |
| 2015-07-03 00:37:20 | tim.peters | create | |