Message246330
| Author | Mark.Shannon |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Arfrever, Mark.Shannon, asvetlov, gvanrossum, larry, martin.panter, ncoghlan, python-dev, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2015-07-05.18:41:42 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1436121702.83.0.136798060875.issue24325@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
If type.coroutine is not the first and only decorator, then things may be even worse. Code objects are currently immutable. This change would mean that a call to types.coroutine in one place in the code would change the semantics of another piece of code in a potentially surprising way. I think creating a copy is probably the best thing to. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-07-05 18:41:42 | Mark.Shannon | set | recipients: + Mark.Shannon, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, scoder, vstinner, larry, Arfrever, asvetlov, python-dev, martin.panter, yselivanov |
| 2015-07-05 18:41:42 | Mark.Shannon | set | messageid: <1436121702.83.0.136798060875.issue24325@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-07-05 18:41:42 | Mark.Shannon | link | issue24325 messages |
| 2015-07-05 18:41:42 | Mark.Shannon | create | |