Message247877
| Author | scoder |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Yury.Selivanov, alex.gronholm, gvanrossum, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2015-08-02.15:07:44 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <55BE321B.2080706@behnel.de> |
| In-reply-to | <1438524892.24.0.507249972239.issue24383@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
It would be nice to have this applied to 3.5 even. I'm aware that this is a new feature that shouldn't go in any more at this point, but if it could get added in 3.5.1 at least, I think it would fill a rather clear and annoying gap when it comes to tool integration. If someone explained async/await as a new syntax feature for async programming to me, and then mentioned that you can't await a Future, I'd be rather surprised, to put it mildly. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-08-02 15:07:44 | scoder | set | recipients: + scoder, gvanrossum, vstinner, alex.gronholm, Yury.Selivanov, yselivanov |
| 2015-08-02 15:07:44 | scoder | link | issue24383 messages |
| 2015-08-02 15:07:44 | scoder | create | |