Message247928
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Yury.Selivanov, alex.gronholm, gvanrossum, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2015-08-03.15:03:11 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAP7+vJKpiMB9f6H4uWJPGKtkMzRyjiqXH_1HS_9KKZKztXSxAg@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1438602337.29.0.407279237301.issue24383@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Every individual use case can be dealt with easily by adding simple helper functions. I really want to keep async and threads separate. And it's no coincidence that concurrent.futures is threadsafe; that's part of its spec. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-08-03 15:03:11 | gvanrossum | set | recipients: + gvanrossum, scoder, vstinner, alex.gronholm, Yury.Selivanov, yselivanov |
| 2015-08-03 15:03:11 | gvanrossum | link | issue24383 messages |
| 2015-08-03 15:03:11 | gvanrossum | create | |