Message249845
| Author | tim.peters |
|---|---|
| Recipients | BreamoreBoy, aconrad, belopolsky, larry, mark.dickinson, python-dev, r.david.murray, tbarbugli, tim.peters, trcarden, vivanov, vstinner |
| Date | 2015-09-04.22:31:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1441405889.61.0.585398320917.issue23517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Yes, it would be good to hear from Mark. When I first saw this report, I checked to see whether he was on the nosy list. He is, but is apparently busy elsewhere.
My opinions haven't changed: nearest/even is unnatural for rounding times ("sometimes up, sometimes down" grates against the nature of monotonically non-decreasing timestamps), but it doesn't make a lick of real difference. If the inconsequential choice was documented, then sure, that it _was_ documented makes it consequential, so that's the one that must be used. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-09-04 22:31:29 | tim.peters | set | recipients: + tim.peters, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, vstinner, larry, r.david.murray, aconrad, BreamoreBoy, vivanov, python-dev, tbarbugli, trcarden |
| 2015-09-04 22:31:29 | tim.peters | set | messageid: <1441405889.61.0.585398320917.issue23517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-09-04 22:31:29 | tim.peters | link | issue23517 messages |
| 2015-09-04 22:31:29 | tim.peters | create | |