Message249879
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | BreamoreBoy, aconrad, belopolsky, larry, mark.dickinson, python-dev, r.david.murray, tbarbugli, tim.peters, trcarden, vivanov, vstinner |
| Date | 2015-09-05.01:25:22 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1441416322.37.0.937691349335.issue23517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> timestamps aren't random, so "statistical bias" is roughly meaningless in this context. I agree. I don't think I made any arguments about timestamps specifically other than a consistency with timedeltas. In the later case, I think all the usual arguments for half-to-even tiebreaker apply. Let's just leave it at "When in doubt - use Dutch rounding." |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-09-05 01:25:22 | belopolsky | set | recipients: + belopolsky, tim.peters, mark.dickinson, vstinner, larry, r.david.murray, aconrad, BreamoreBoy, vivanov, python-dev, tbarbugli, trcarden |
| 2015-09-05 01:25:22 | belopolsky | set | messageid: <1441416322.37.0.937691349335.issue23517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-09-05 01:25:22 | belopolsky | link | issue23517 messages |
| 2015-09-05 01:25:22 | belopolsky | create | |