Message249925
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | BreamoreBoy, aconrad, belopolsky, larry, mark.dickinson, python-dev, r.david.murray, tbarbugli, tim.peters, trcarden, vivanov, vstinner |
| Date | 2015-09-05.20:49:31 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAMpsgwZ4ZudpE1rRtu7wYeHQJNwOdYELEcsdFEHy+kU4Fsmhkw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1441471597.97.0.241641168782.issue23517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Alex & I do agree nearest/even must be used. Ok, so Python 3.6 should be updated to use ROUND_HALF_EVEN, and then updated patches should be backported to Python 3.4 and 3.5. Right? Right now, Python 3.6 uses ROUND_HALF_UP. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-09-05 20:49:31 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, tim.peters, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, larry, r.david.murray, aconrad, BreamoreBoy, vivanov, python-dev, tbarbugli, trcarden |
| 2015-09-05 20:49:31 | vstinner | link | issue23517 messages |
| 2015-09-05 20:49:31 | vstinner | create | |