Message250103
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | BreamoreBoy, aconrad, belopolsky, larry, mark.dickinson, python-dev, r.david.murray, tbarbugli, tim.peters, trcarden, vivanov, vstinner |
| Date | 2015-09-07.12:26:40 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1441628800.31.0.765045460046.issue23517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Larry> Well, for now I assume it really truly genuinely isn't going in 3.5.0. This is an unfortunate outcome. Larry> I suppose we can debate about 3.4.x and 3.5.1 later It is even more unfortunate that the question of whether this regression is a bug or not is up for debate again. Victor> The code will be new, I'm not condifent enough to push it immedialty into python 3.5. I don't understand why any new code is needed to fix a regression. All you need to do is to revert a few chunks of 1e9cc1a03365 where the regression was introduced. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-09-07 12:26:40 | belopolsky | set | recipients: + belopolsky, tim.peters, mark.dickinson, vstinner, larry, r.david.murray, aconrad, BreamoreBoy, vivanov, python-dev, tbarbugli, trcarden |
| 2015-09-07 12:26:40 | belopolsky | set | messageid: <1441628800.31.0.765045460046.issue23517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-09-07 12:26:40 | belopolsky | link | issue23517 messages |
| 2015-09-07 12:26:40 | belopolsky | create | |