Message250406
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | desbma, r.david.murray |
| Date | 2015-09-10.19:10:04 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1441912204.18.0.412031551142.issue25063@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
No, it's to copy file like objects that aren't necessarily true file system objects. The only requirement is that they support a minimal file-like object interface. There is no suggestion or requirement that the object supports file descriptors (which would make it a real os file object). I think changing it to use os.sendfile if possible would be too risky in terms of causing unexpected breakage (objects that look like they have a file descriptor but really don't), especially since handling file system files is explicitly not the purpose of copyfileobj. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-09-10 19:10:04 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, desbma |
| 2015-09-10 19:10:04 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1441912204.18.0.412031551142.issue25063@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-09-10 19:10:04 | r.david.murray | link | issue25063 messages |
| 2015-09-10 19:10:04 | r.david.murray | create | |