Message251099
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | doko, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, r.david.murray, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2015-09-19.18:45:03 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1442688303.32.0.767621461553.issue21264@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Yes the point is to test compilation of the path. If I run python3 -m compilelall on my installed python, it works fine (zero return code). I can't really investigate this further right now, but it isn't obvious to me what the answer is from the information in the issue so far, except that it doesn't *look* like it should be necessary to skip the tests unless the installation directories are read only *and* the .pyc files in them are non-existent or out of date. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-09-19 18:45:03 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, terry.reedy, doko, ezio.melotti, michael.foord |
| 2015-09-19 18:45:03 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1442688303.32.0.767621461553.issue21264@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-09-19 18:45:03 | r.david.murray | link | issue21264 messages |
| 2015-09-19 18:45:03 | r.david.murray | create | |