Message251331
| Author | steven.daprano |
|---|---|
| Recipients | David MacIver, bar.harel, benjamin.peterson, mark.dickinson, steven.daprano |
| Date | 2015-09-22.16:58:43 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <20150922165839.GQ31152@ando.pearwood.info> |
| In-reply-to | <1442690955.44.0.771600760834.issue25177@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Bar, thanks for the time you put into diagnosing this error, it is definitely a bug. The intention is for mean([huge, huge]) to return huge, not raise OverflowError. I'm reluctant to say that mean() will *never* raise OverflowError, but it certainly shouldn't do so for this case if it can be avoided. I think Mark's diagnosis is probably correct that refactoring the code will fix this. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-09-22 16:58:44 | steven.daprano | set | recipients: + steven.daprano, mark.dickinson, benjamin.peterson, David MacIver, bar.harel |
| 2015-09-22 16:58:44 | steven.daprano | link | issue25177 messages |
| 2015-09-22 16:58:43 | steven.daprano | create | |