Message252958
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | asvetlov, azsorkin, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, michael.foord, pconnell, pitrou, rbcollins, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2015-10-13.20:03:52 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1444766632.6.0.290827976796.issue17908@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
While I like the idea of adding an option to force a garbage collection after running each time, I don't like how unittest is growing :-( It looks more and more like regrtest and I hate regrtest (I reworked its code recently to create a less ugly "libregrtes").
Once Antoine Pitrou proposed to add "plugins" to unittest. I agree that we need a gate between unittest and all other test frameworks: nose, py.test, testtools/testrepository/testr, etc.
Seriously, don't you think that something is wrong with such API?
def __init__(self, module='__main__', defaultTest=None, argv=None,
testRunner=None, testLoader=loader.defaultTestLoader,
exit=True, verbosity=1, failfast=None, catchbreak=None,
buffer=None, warnings=None, *, tb_locals=False,
gc_enabled=False): |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-10-13 20:03:52 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, gvanrossum, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, asvetlov, serhiy.storchaka, pconnell, azsorkin |
| 2015-10-13 20:03:52 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1444766632.6.0.290827976796.issue17908@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-10-13 20:03:52 | vstinner | link | issue17908 messages |
| 2015-10-13 20:03:52 | vstinner | create | |