Message253475
| Author | nedbat |
|---|---|
| Recipients | berker.peksag, brett.cannon, larry, matrixise, ncoghlan, nedbat, python-dev, r.david.murray, untitaker, yselivanov |
| Date | 2015-10-26.14:39:06 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1445870347.16.0.0894251539222.issue20438@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
This is the situation I am in: coverage.py uses getargspec in a very simple way in its tooling. I support 2.7 and 3.5, so I have to do this:
try:
getargspec = inspect.getfullargspec
except AttributeError:
getargspec = inspect.getargspec
argspec = getargspec(function)
It seems like needless churn. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-10-26 14:39:07 | nedbat | set | recipients: + nedbat, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, larry, r.david.murray, python-dev, berker.peksag, yselivanov, matrixise, untitaker |
| 2015-10-26 14:39:07 | nedbat | set | messageid: <1445870347.16.0.0894251539222.issue20438@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-10-26 14:39:07 | nedbat | link | issue20438 messages |
| 2015-10-26 14:39:06 | nedbat | create | |