Message253500
| Author | yselivanov |
|---|---|
| Recipients | berker.peksag, brett.cannon, larry, matrixise, ncoghlan, nedbat, python-dev, r.david.murray, untitaker, yselivanov |
| Date | 2015-10-26.20:34:21 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1445891661.91.0.18664933337.issue20438@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> The thing is, we've adopted a policy that if something exists in python2.7 we shouldn't delete it in python3 until after 2.7 is officially out of maintenance (at the earliest), in order to facilitate single-source porting to python3. That policy was adopted relatively recently, after the deprecation warning mentioning 3.6 was added in this issue, as I recall it. In this case we better resurrect getargspec(). Here's an issue for that: #25486 |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-10-26 20:34:21 | yselivanov | set | recipients: + yselivanov, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, larry, nedbat, r.david.murray, python-dev, berker.peksag, matrixise, untitaker |
| 2015-10-26 20:34:21 | yselivanov | set | messageid: <1445891661.91.0.18664933337.issue20438@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-10-26 20:34:21 | yselivanov | link | issue20438 messages |
| 2015-10-26 20:34:21 | yselivanov | create | |