Message254303
| Author | abarry |
|---|---|
| Recipients | abarry, docs@python, eric.smith, jayvdb |
| Date | 2015-11-07.22:04:25 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1446933866.12.0.471415008286.issue25179@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I was under the impression that they would work without any additional work (as they'd have access to the outer scope). Of course, trying to access a local variable would be an error as it's not yet defined. My point is more that we shouldn't have to account for such a small case - if they can be used, then let them be used, and if they can't, then don't (unless the modification is straightforward, which it might not be). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-11-07 22:04:26 | abarry | set | recipients: + abarry, eric.smith, docs@python, jayvdb |
| 2015-11-07 22:04:26 | abarry | set | messageid: <1446933866.12.0.471415008286.issue25179@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-11-07 22:04:26 | abarry | link | issue25179 messages |
| 2015-11-07 22:04:25 | abarry | create | |