Message254468
| Author | martin.panter |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ezio.melotti, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2015-11-11.01:31:53 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1447205516.33.0.711444801775.issue25590@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
getattr-once.patch handles my first two points. It backports the set() change, and avoids the hasattr() check. I guess we apply this to 3.4+; expect merge conflicts with 3.6. As for the last point, I will make another patch to include special attributes that don’t actually exist yet, where they are currently omitted. Would we consider this a new feature for 3.6? Going by Serhiy’s logic in <https://bugs.python.org/issue25209#msg251514> I would say yes. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-11-11 01:31:56 | martin.panter | set | recipients: + martin.panter, ezio.melotti, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2015-11-11 01:31:56 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1447205516.33.0.711444801775.issue25590@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015-11-11 01:31:56 | martin.panter | link | issue25590 messages |
| 2015-11-11 01:31:53 | martin.panter | create | |