Message258108
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-01-12.16:29:08 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAP7+vJJ2+gibh9CT-GjOLHqnMYotaQMiOh3ZH3t_bzcupWfR1g@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <CAMpsgwZrNkKYrC8MjC_WHqnGj3drhLGAB0KzhhSAhdm=cHozXA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Could we make this feature available at the Python level too? It sounds really useful. --Guido (mobile) On Jan 12, 2016 2:01 AM, "STINNER Victor" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > STINNER Victor added the comment: > > See my old issue #10833 which proposed to *remove* the arbitrary limit > on strings. It was rejected. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue26090> > _______________________________________ > |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-01-12 16:29:08 | gvanrossum | set | recipients: + gvanrossum, vstinner, ezio.melotti, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2016-01-12 16:29:08 | gvanrossum | link | issue26090 messages |
| 2016-01-12 16:29:08 | gvanrossum | create | |