Message258706
| Author | josh.r |
|---|---|
| Recipients | introom, josh.r, nadeem.vawda, serhiy.storchaka, twouters |
| Date | 2016-01-20.18:12:56 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1453313576.05.0.930183367959.issue25007@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Patch looks good, but incomplete. Supporting __deepcopy__ (as a simple wrapper around __copy__ that ignores the second argument) would provide complete support. Also, should there be tests? I mean, I assume the .copy() method itself is tested, but just to detect stupid regressions, seems like testing __copy__/__deepcopy__ for identical behavior would be a good thing. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-01-20 18:12:56 | josh.r | set | recipients: + josh.r, twouters, nadeem.vawda, serhiy.storchaka, introom |
| 2016-01-20 18:12:56 | josh.r | set | messageid: <1453313576.05.0.930183367959.issue25007@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-01-20 18:12:56 | josh.r | link | issue25007 messages |
| 2016-01-20 18:12:56 | josh.r | create | |