Message 259392 - Python tracker

Message259392

Author	pitrou
Recipients	Yury.Selivanov, jtaylor, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, yselivanov
Date	2016-02-02.14:53:16
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<56B0C2DB.9010404@free.fr>
In-reply-to	<1454424518.45.0.277729800673.issue26249@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
Le 02/02/2016 15:48, STINNER Victor a écrit : >> What this says is that some internals uses of PyMem_XXX should be replaced with PyObject_XXX. > > Why not changing PyMem_XXX to use the same fast allocator than PyObject_XXX? (as proposed in this issue) Why have two sets of functions doing exactly the same thing?

Content

Le 02/02/2016 15:48, STINNER Victor a écrit :
>> What this says is that some internals uses of PyMem_XXX should be replaced with PyObject_XXX.
> 
> Why not changing PyMem_XXX to use the same fast allocator than
PyObject_XXX? (as proposed in this issue)

Why have two sets of functions doing exactly the same thing?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-02-02 14:53:16	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, rhettinger, vstinner, Yury.Selivanov, jtaylor, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov
2016-02-02 14:53:16	pitrou	link	issue26249 messages
2016-02-02 14:53:16	pitrou	create