Message259515
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brett.cannon, florin.papa, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, yselivanov, zbyrne |
| Date | 2016-02-03.20:33:03 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAMpsgwZOoS34w+qksYLmMgLtgZAT5supV_7dv76ifrGX-yEppA@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1454529402.15.0.0602173531103.issue26275@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> If running time is close to the limit, different run will use different number of repetitions. This will add additional instability. Maybe, to be honest I don't know. How can we decide if a patch makes perf.py more and less stable? > I prefer a stable number of repetitions manually calibrated for average modern computer. The problem is to define an "average modern computer". |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-02-03 20:33:03 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, brett.cannon, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, zbyrne, florin.papa |
| 2016-02-03 20:33:03 | vstinner | link | issue26275 messages |
| 2016-02-03 20:33:03 | vstinner | create | |