Message260514
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | catalin.manciu, florin.papa, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-02-19.09:46:02 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAMpsgwYw3z_+4b+U=CX4j8RVAw=GAxZyFBToUvQABBMVubJbLg@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1455873612.78.0.77238069526.issue26382@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Catalin Gabriel Manciu: "(...) allowing us to have finer control over the new areas where we enable allocating using the small object allocator and detect where this replacement might be detrimental to the performance" Ah, interesting, do you think that it's possible that my change can *slow down* Python? I don't think so, but I'm interested on feedback on my patch :-) You may try to run benchmarks with my patch. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-02-19 09:46:03 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, florin.papa, catalin.manciu |
| 2016-02-19 09:46:02 | vstinner | link | issue26382 messages |
| 2016-02-19 09:46:02 | vstinner | create | |