Message261470
| Author | SilentGhost |
|---|---|
| Recipients | SilentGhost, kristjan.jonsson, martin.panter, maubp, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2016-03-09.19:58:22 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1457553502.57.0.62651423673.issue26499@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
All the highlighted issue are now fixed. The limit on n in read1 wasn't tested. Your suggestion regarding testing went a bit over my head, Martin. So, just trying to make sure we're on the same page. ExtendedReadTest, where I thought placing these new tests, is already employing FakeSocket, but I'm not sure how one would add a second response and to what. In any case, some of the code in that class seems rather specific, so it's not clear if it could or should be reused. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-03-09 19:58:22 | SilentGhost | set | recipients: + SilentGhost, kristjan.jonsson, maubp, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2016-03-09 19:58:22 | SilentGhost | set | messageid: <1457553502.57.0.62651423673.issue26499@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-03-09 19:58:22 | SilentGhost | link | issue26499 messages |
| 2016-03-09 19:58:22 | SilentGhost | create | |