Message261489
| Author | martin.panter |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Alex.Willmer, martin.panter, paul.moore, pitrou, rpetrov, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware |
| Date | 2016-03-10.10:02:32 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1457604152.71.0.481211147813.issue17596@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Yes I would tend to think including <wincrypt.h> would be harmless on Windows, but I don’t have a native Windows to try it out on. Here is a proposed patch anyway. It would be good for someone to be able to confirm it doesn’t break the normal Windows build. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-03-10 10:02:32 | martin.panter | set | recipients: + martin.panter, paul.moore, pitrou, tim.golden, rpetrov, zach.ware, steve.dower, Alex.Willmer |
| 2016-03-10 10:02:32 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1457604152.71.0.481211147813.issue17596@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-03-10 10:02:32 | martin.panter | link | issue17596 messages |
| 2016-03-10 10:02:32 | martin.panter | create | |