Message261609
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Elena.Oat, belopolsky, docs@python, ezio.melotti, flox, martin.panter, python-dev, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-03-11.21:43:52 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1457732632.1.0.526544157378.issue13305@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
acucci's patch doc.patch suggests to use format "%4Y". Problem: I tried it on Linux, and it looks like it doesn't work.
>>> datetime.datetime.strptime("1980", "%Y")
datetime.datetime(1980, 1, 1, 0, 0)
>>> datetime.datetime.strptime("1980", "%4Y")
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ValueError: '4' is a bad directive in format '%4Y'
Or maybe I misunderstood the doc change. Do you suggest to use %4Y format with strptime(), with strftime() or with both? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-03-11 21:43:52 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, belopolsky, ezio.melotti, flox, docs@python, python-dev, martin.panter, Elena.Oat |
| 2016-03-11 21:43:52 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1457732632.1.0.526544157378.issue13305@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-03-11 21:43:52 | vstinner | link | issue13305 messages |
| 2016-03-11 21:43:52 | vstinner | create | |