Message263680
| Author | Zooko.Wilcox-O'Hearn |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Zooko.Wilcox-O'Hearn, dstufft |
| Date | 2016-04-18.18:41:15 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1461004875.7.0.995120221983.issue26798@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Oh, just to be clear, I didn't mean to imply that BLAKE2 is _less_ safe than SHA-3. My best estimate is that BLAKE2 and SHA-3 are equivalently safe, and that either of them is safer than SHA-2, SHA-1, or MD5. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-04-18 18:41:15 | Zooko.Wilcox-O'Hearn | set | recipients: + Zooko.Wilcox-O'Hearn, dstufft |
| 2016-04-18 18:41:15 | Zooko.Wilcox-O'Hearn | set | messageid: <1461004875.7.0.995120221983.issue26798@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-04-18 18:41:15 | Zooko.Wilcox-O'Hearn | link | issue26798 messages |
| 2016-04-18 18:41:15 | Zooko.Wilcox-O'Hearn | create | |