Message264071
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | StyXman, christian.heimes, martin.panter, neologix, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-04-23.22:35:24 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAMpsgwb22g5qHegumFwtZbYb=GMm0BQ3y+S+79ZbP4bDBnCeTQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1461439464.32.0.546175420918.issue26826@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Kerbel support ok, but what about the libc support? Do you know if it is planned? Or do you want to use the syscall() low-level API. If we take the syscall() path, I suggest to make the function private in the os module. Wait until the API is standardized in the libc. Sometimes the libc changes minor things, ir's not always a thin wrapper to the syscall. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-04-23 22:35:24 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, pitrou, christian.heimes, StyXman, neologix, martin.panter |
| 2016-04-23 22:35:24 | vstinner | link | issue26826 messages |
| 2016-04-23 22:35:24 | vstinner | create | |