Message265375
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | georg.brandl, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2016-05-12.08:03:18 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1463040199.11.0.588158577385.issue27007@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
According to the discussion on Python-Dev [1] alternate constructors should return an instance of the subclass (else why invoke it through the subclass). bytes.fromhex() and bytearray.fromhex() are the only exceptions. I think bytes.fromhex() and bytearray.fromhex() should be changed to match the behavior of all other alternate constructors. [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.devel/157649 |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-05-12 08:03:19 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, georg.brandl |
| 2016-05-12 08:03:19 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1463040199.11.0.588158577385.issue27007@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-05-12 08:03:18 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue27007 messages |
| 2016-05-12 08:03:18 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |