Message265551
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Lukasa, alex, christian.heimes, dstufft, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-05-14.22:57:13 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1463266633.75.0.639776891788.issue26970@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I have to replace _PyOS_URandom with a variant that doesn't need the GIL Please don't replace it, but add a new function which report errors differently. Which kind of granularity do you expect for the error reporting? Just a boolean (success or failure)? Most implementations of _PyOS_URandom() already has a private "int raise" parameter to specify how errors are reported: raise an exception or call Py_FatalError(). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-05-14 22:57:13 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, janssen, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, alex, dstufft, Lukasa |
| 2016-05-14 22:57:13 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1463266633.75.0.639776891788.issue26970@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-05-14 22:57:13 | vstinner | link | issue26970 messages |
| 2016-05-14 22:57:13 | vstinner | create | |