Message266050
| Author | martin.panter |
|---|---|
| Recipients | martin.panter, paul.moore, rpetrov, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware |
| Date | 2016-05-22.05:15:20 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1463894120.96.0.376107266303.issue17599@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Would it be better to define all the things in "winreparse.h" with names that are less likely to conflict, say Py_REPARSE_DATA_BUFFER etc? This would be a more general way to avoid conflicts, and also avoid hacking the configure script. Also, is the “#ifndef MAXIMUM_REPARSE_DATA_BUFFER_SIZE” condition necessary? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-05-22 05:15:21 | martin.panter | set | recipients: + martin.panter, paul.moore, tim.golden, rpetrov, zach.ware, steve.dower |
| 2016-05-22 05:15:20 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1463894120.96.0.376107266303.issue17599@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-05-22 05:15:20 | martin.panter | link | issue17599 messages |
| 2016-05-22 05:15:20 | martin.panter | create | |