Message267511
| Author | martin.panter |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Colm Buckley, doko, larry, lemburg, martin.panter, matejcik, ned.deily, rhettinger, socketpair, thomas-petazzoni, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-06-06.02:39:33 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1465180773.89.0.177111757424.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Maybe an alternative would be to add a special PYTHONHASHSEED=best-effort (or whatever) value that says if there is no entropy available, use a predictable hash seed. That would force whoever starts the Python process to be aware of the problem. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-06-06 02:39:34 | martin.panter | set | recipients: + martin.panter, lemburg, rhettinger, doko, vstinner, larry, matejcik, ned.deily, socketpair, thomas-petazzoni, Colm Buckley |
| 2016-06-06 02:39:33 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1465180773.89.0.177111757424.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-06-06 02:39:33 | martin.panter | link | issue26839 messages |
| 2016-06-06 02:39:33 | martin.panter | create | |