Message267626
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Colm Buckley, alex, doko, larry, lemburg, martin.panter, matejcik, ned.deily, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, thomas-petazzoni, vstinner, ztane |
| Date | 2016-06-07.11:34:34 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1465299275.2.0.0393500228347.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Stefan Krah: "I think this is a very good idea. Just a flag for "cryptographically secure" or not." If you consider it is worth it, please open a new issue. I dislike the idea of a boolean. The quality of each system RNG has been discussed long enough to be able to say that "cryptographically secure" term depends a lot of your use case, and experts disagree between themself :-) You might even have to consider the version of the Linux kernel to decide if /dev/urandom is good enough or not for you use case. The implementation changed last years. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-06-07 11:34:35 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, lemburg, rhettinger, doko, larry, matejcik, ned.deily, alex, skrah, python-dev, martin.panter, ztane, thomas-petazzoni, Colm Buckley |
| 2016-06-07 11:34:35 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1465299275.2.0.0393500228347.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-06-07 11:34:35 | vstinner | link | issue26839 messages |
| 2016-06-07 11:34:34 | vstinner | create | |