Message267643
| Author | dstufft |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Colm Buckley, Lukasa, alex, doko, dstufft, larry, lemburg, martin.panter, matejcik, ned.deily, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, thomas-petazzoni, vstinner, ztane |
| Date | 2016-06-07.12:09:01 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1465301341.78.0.57631558945.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
To be clear, I don't have a problem adding ``os.urandom_info`` but I don't think that it solves the problem, we shouldn't force people to introspect ``os.urandom`` to figure out if CPython decided to make it less secure on this invocation or not. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-06-07 12:09:01 | dstufft | set | recipients: + dstufft, lemburg, rhettinger, doko, vstinner, larry, matejcik, ned.deily, alex, skrah, python-dev, martin.panter, ztane, Lukasa, thomas-petazzoni, Colm Buckley |
| 2016-06-07 12:09:01 | dstufft | set | messageid: <1465301341.78.0.57631558945.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-06-07 12:09:01 | dstufft | link | issue26839 messages |
| 2016-06-07 12:09:01 | dstufft | create | |