Message267945
| Author | dstufft |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Theodore Tso, dstufft, larry, ncoghlan, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-06-09.00:35:18 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1465432518.46.0.681476316715.issue27266@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Again, I cite #25003: he implicitly ruled there that it's not permissible for os.urandom() to block on Solaris, so I think he agrees with me. To be clear, that's an entirely different kind of blocking. That made os.urandom on Solaris behave similarly to /dev/random, where it would randomly block for all users of that API regularly. I would have made the same ruling, this blocking is not that blocking. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-06-09 00:35:18 | dstufft | set | recipients: + dstufft, ncoghlan, vstinner, larry, Theodore Tso |
| 2016-06-09 00:35:18 | dstufft | set | messageid: <1465432518.46.0.681476316715.issue27266@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-06-09 00:35:18 | dstufft | link | issue27266 messages |
| 2016-06-09 00:35:18 | dstufft | create | |