Message268007
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Lukasa, Theodore Tso, christian.heimes, dstufft, larry, lemburg, martin.panter, ncoghlan, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-06-09.09:23:54 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAMpsgwa6Ei3cq0m5ox=Q5NBFycp1a083BF3vdwE9pvFktR94+Q@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <2816eb03-1d4e-4546-10a2-cf2e6581bb5f@cheimes.de> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Christian Heimes: > For os.urandom() let's define it as non-blocking and raise an exception > when it would blocks. There is a lot of discussion around random in the bug tracker, it's really hard to follow :-( Please use specific issues for each idea. Making os.urandom() non-blocking and always raise an exception is not the goal of this issue. This idea explicitly makes os.urandom() blocking on Linux. I suggest you to open a new issue. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-06-09 09:23:55 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, lemburg, ncoghlan, larry, christian.heimes, martin.panter, dstufft, Lukasa, Theodore Tso |
| 2016-06-09 09:23:54 | vstinner | link | issue27266 messages |
| 2016-06-09 09:23:54 | vstinner | create | |