Message268199
| Author | christian.heimes |
|---|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, dstufft, martin.panter, rhettinger, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-06-11.08:05:23 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <cc7fc77b-f689-757d-bd4a-426268b016b8@cheimes.de> |
| In-reply-to | <1465596460.62.0.631064042432.issue27272@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On 2016-06-11 00:07, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > Raymond Hettinger added the comment: > >> But I'll be happiest if nothing changes here (given that Guido ruled >> yesterday that Python's current urandom() implementation has to be >> reverted to once again match Linux's non-blocking urandom() behavior). > > With urandom() behavior restored, can we close this? No, the import of random is still broken on all BSD platforms during early boot. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-06-11 08:05:23 | christian.heimes | set | recipients: + christian.heimes, tim.peters, rhettinger, vstinner, martin.panter, dstufft |
| 2016-06-11 08:05:23 | christian.heimes | link | issue27272 messages |
| 2016-06-11 08:05:23 | christian.heimes | create | |