Message268565
| Author | gregory.p.smith |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Rotem Yaari, Yury.Selivanov, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, larry, ncoghlan, oconnor663, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2016-06-14.16:06:11 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1465920372.07.0.0514101367582.issue25782@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I think I'm with Nick on this, the re-ordering fix is the closest to the right thing to do for 3.5 as it at least leaves all exceptions present in the chain. As a more accurate long term fix, it would be great if we could express the tree via tuples in exception context in 3.6 or later. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-06-14 16:06:12 | gregory.p.smith | set | recipients: + gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, georg.brandl, ncoghlan, vstinner, larry, Yury.Selivanov, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, oconnor663, Rotem Yaari |
| 2016-06-14 16:06:12 | gregory.p.smith | set | messageid: <1465920372.07.0.0514101367582.issue25782@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-06-14 16:06:12 | gregory.p.smith | link | issue25782 messages |
| 2016-06-14 16:06:11 | gregory.p.smith | create | |