Message268972
| Author | martin.panter |
|---|---|
| Recipients | BreamoreBoy, martin.panter, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-06-21.06:07:52 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1466489272.91.0.678423161872.issue19613@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I presume the original report was due to testing when the server happened to return an article with an empty body. The failing test is # XXX this could exceptionally happen... self.assertNotIn(article.lines[-1], (b".", b".\n", b".\r\n")) The test code already admits that what it is testing cannot be guaranteed (an article body could end with a full stop). And we have found another case where the test is not valid (an article with zero lines). I say remove this part of the test, at least when testing the article() and body() methods. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-06-21 06:07:52 | martin.panter | set | recipients: + martin.panter, vstinner, BreamoreBoy |
| 2016-06-21 06:07:52 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1466489272.91.0.678423161872.issue19613@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-06-21 06:07:52 | martin.panter | link | issue19613 messages |
| 2016-06-21 06:07:52 | martin.panter | create | |