Message270829
| Author | deronnax |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Anders.Hovmöller, Arfrever, Eric.Hanchrow, Roman.Evstifeev, SilentGhost, aymeric.augustin, barry, belopolsky, berker.peksag, cvrebert, davydov, deronnax, eric.araujo, flying sheep, jcea, jstasiak, jwilk, karlcow, kirpit, martin.panter, mcepl, mihaic, nagle, pbryan, perey, piotr.dobrogost, r.david.murray, roysmith, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-07-19.14:20:33 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAKJVQ89Ghbp8Sro71RSOTiB0MfnQwqy8MrJqgFTUfMuyCBOmNg@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <BA37345A-C09D-4F78-BCA2-F2BB819842DF@killingar.net> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
because it limits itself to only support the RFC 3339 subset, as explained in the begining of the discussion. 2016-07-19 16:07 GMT+02:00 Anders Hovmöller <report@bugs.python.org>: > > Anders Hovmöller added the comment: > > The tests attached to this ticket seem pretty bare. Issues that I can spot directly: > > - only tests for datetimes, not times or dates > - only tests for zulu and "-8:00” timezones > - no tests for invalid input (parsing a valid date as a datetime for example) > - only tests for YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ, but ISO8601 supports: > - Naive times > - Timezone information (specified as offsets or as Z for 0 offset) > - Year > - Year-month > - Year-month-date > - Year-week > - Year-week-weekday > - Year-ordinal day > - Hour > - Hour-minute > - Hour-minute > - Hour-minute-second > - Hour-minute-second-microsecond > - All combinations of the three "families" above! > (the above list is a copy paste from my project that implements all ISO8601 that fits into native python: https://github.com/boxed/iso8601 <https://github.com/boxed/iso8601>) > > This is a more reasonable test suite: https://github.com/boxed/iso8601/blob/master/iso8601.py#L166 <https://github.com/boxed/iso8601/blob/master/iso8601.py#L166> although it lacks the tests for bogus inputs. > >> On 2016-07-16, at 03:41, Alexander Belopolsky <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: >> >> >> Alexander Belopolsky added the comment: >> >> I would very much like to see this ready before the feature cut-off for Python 3.6. Could someone post a summary on python-ideas to get a show of hands on some of the remaining wrinkles? >> >> I would not worry about a C implementation at this point. We can put python implementation in _strptime.py and call it from C as we do for the strptime method. >> >> ---------- >> >> _______________________________________ >> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> >> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15873> >> _______________________________________ > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue15873> > _______________________________________ |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-07-19 14:20:33 | deronnax | set | recipients: + deronnax, barry, jcea, roysmith, belopolsky, nagle, vstinner, jwilk, mcepl, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, davydov, cvrebert, karlcow, SilentGhost, perey, flying sheep, mihaic, aymeric.augustin, Roman.Evstifeev, berker.peksag, martin.panter, piotr.dobrogost, kirpit, Anders.Hovmöller, jstasiak, Eric.Hanchrow, pbryan |
| 2016-07-19 14:20:33 | deronnax | link | issue15873 messages |
| 2016-07-19 14:20:33 | deronnax | create | |