Message271472
| Author | scoder |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brycenesbitt, eli.bendersky, jjmiller50, martin.panter, pocek, rhettinger, scoder |
| Date | 2016-07-27.19:47:37 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <E4511073-951C-4418-BDEE-AD42F3E14B37@behnel.de> |
| In-reply-to | <1469642344.58.0.410472937719.issue18304@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On second thought, I think it should be supported (also?) in the parser. Otherwise, using it with an async parser would be different from (and more involved than) one-shot parsing. That seems wrong. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-07-27 19:47:37 | scoder | set | recipients: + scoder, rhettinger, eli.bendersky, martin.panter, brycenesbitt, pocek, jjmiller50 |
| 2016-07-27 19:47:37 | scoder | link | issue18304 messages |
| 2016-07-27 19:47:37 | scoder | create | |