Message271763
| Author | xiang.zhang |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Jeffrey.Walton, alex, alexandre.vassalotti, christian.heimes, deadshort, dmalcolm, donmez, fweimer, gregory.p.smith, jcea, jwilk, loewis, mark.dickinson, martin.panter, matejcik, nnorwitz, pitrou, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, xiang.zhang, ztane |
| Date | 2016-08-01.02:51:49 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1470019910.1.0.696396771282.issue1621@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Hmm, I don't tend to infer platform characteristics. IMHO, it's a simple problem: sum up two lists' length which may overflow in logic. With your argument, does it means it seems somewhat meaningless to have a List a Py_ssize_t length since it can never reach it? Checks against PY_SSIZE_T_MAX have already existed (for example, in ins1). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-08-01 02:51:50 | xiang.zhang | set | recipients: + xiang.zhang, loewis, nnorwitz, gregory.p.smith, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, alexandre.vassalotti, donmez, matejcik, jwilk, alex, dmalcolm, python-dev, deadshort, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, ztane, fweimer, Jeffrey.Walton |
| 2016-08-01 02:51:50 | xiang.zhang | set | messageid: <1470019910.1.0.696396771282.issue1621@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-08-01 02:51:50 | xiang.zhang | link | issue1621 messages |
| 2016-08-01 02:51:49 | xiang.zhang | create | |