Message272503
| Author | ztane |
|---|---|
| Recipients | serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, yselivanov, ztane |
| Date | 2016-08-12.07:38:32 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1470987512.66.0.620110585299.issue27128@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
About "I hesitate between the C types "int" and "Py_ssize_t" for nargs. I read once that using "int" can cause performance issues on a loop using "i++" and "data[i]" because the compiler has to handle integer overflow of the int type." This is true because of -fwrapv, but I believe it is true also for Py_ssize_t which is also of signed type. However, there would be a speed-up achievable by disabling -fwrapv, because only then the i++; data[i] can be safely optimized into *(++data) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-08-12 07:38:32 | ztane | set | recipients: + ztane, vstinner, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov |
| 2016-08-12 07:38:32 | ztane | set | messageid: <1470987512.66.0.620110585299.issue27128@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-08-12 07:38:32 | ztane | link | issue27128 messages |
| 2016-08-12 07:38:32 | ztane | create | |