Message272566
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Aaron.Meurer, Nofar Schnider, abarry, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, lisroach, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pfalcon, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger, sbaird, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, stutzbach, tim.peters, veky, vstinner, waldir, zach.ware |
| Date | 2016-08-12.21:32:37 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1471037557.85.0.952454435072.issue12345@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> All that said, I agree with Mark that math.e is at best an attractive nuisance.
Why don't we fix the nuisance part without making it less attractive:
class _E(float):
def __pow__(self, other):
if self is e:
return exp(other)
else:
return pow(self, other)
e = _E(2.718281828...)
> It's okay if Python occasionally shows its lighter side in unexpected places.
I would rather see
from math import π
work in the future Pythons.
I like Vi Hart, but I am firmly on the π side in the π vs. τ debate. The problem with τ is that it is visually smaller than π, actually twice smaller: π ≈ ττ, but the actual definition is the opposite. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-08-12 21:32:37 | belopolsky | set | recipients: + belopolsky, gvanrossum, tim.peters, georg.brandl, rhettinger, pfalcon, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, stutzbach, eric.araujo, skrah, Aaron.Meurer, python-dev, sbaird, zach.ware, serhiy.storchaka, waldir, veky, abarry, Nofar Schnider, lisroach |
| 2016-08-12 21:32:37 | belopolsky | set | messageid: <1471037557.85.0.952454435072.issue12345@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-08-12 21:32:37 | belopolsky | link | issue12345 messages |
| 2016-08-12 21:32:37 | belopolsky | create | |