Message 273678 - Python tracker

Message273678

Author	vstinner
Recipients	python-dev, scoder, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date	2016-08-25.21:33:28
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1472160809.15.0.828411510521.issue27830@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> New changeset ffcfa4f005a3 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default': > Issue #27830: Revert, remove _PyFunction_FastCallKeywords() > https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ffcfa4f005a3 I'm sorry, I misunderstood Serhiy's comment. I understood that Serhiy proposed to reuse the current format "PyObject **stack, int nargs, int nkwargs", but in fact he proposes something new in the issue #27213. IMO the issue #27213 can be a major enhancement for Python 3.6. I prefer to wait until the issue #27213 is implemented (that we agreed on the new format), before working again on _PyObject_FastCallKeywords().

Content

> New changeset ffcfa4f005a3 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
> Issue #27830: Revert, remove _PyFunction_FastCallKeywords()
> https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ffcfa4f005a3

I'm sorry, I misunderstood Serhiy's comment. I understood that Serhiy proposed to reuse the current format "PyObject **stack, int nargs, int nkwargs", but in fact he proposes something new in the issue #27213.

IMO the issue #27213 can be a major enhancement for Python 3.6. I prefer to wait until the issue #27213 is implemented (that we agreed on the new format), before working again on _PyObject_FastCallKeywords().

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-08-25 21:33:29	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, scoder, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka
2016-08-25 21:33:29	vstinner	set	messageid: <1472160809.15.0.828411510521.issue27830@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-08-25 21:33:29	vstinner	link	issue27830 messages
2016-08-25 21:33:28	vstinner	create