Message273983
| Author | Clay Gerrard |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Clay Gerrard, barry, demian.brecht, ezio.melotti, gregory.p.smith, martin.panter, r.david.murray, scharron, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2016-08-31.00:34:54 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1472603695.41.0.452505929741.issue22233@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
BUMP. ;) This issue was recently raised as one blocker to OpenStack Object Storage (Swift) finishing our port to python3 (we're hoping to finish adding support >=3.5 by Spring '17 - /me crosses fingers). I wonder if someone might confirm or deny the attached patch is likely to be included in the 3.6 timeframe (circa 12/16?) and/or back-ported to the 3.5 series? FWIW, I would echo other's sentiment that I would much prefer the implementation to be correct even if there was some worry we might have to choose between further optimization and getting a fix ASAP :D Warm Regards, -Clay |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-08-31 00:34:55 | Clay Gerrard | set | recipients: + Clay Gerrard, barry, gregory.p.smith, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, demian.brecht, scharron |
| 2016-08-31 00:34:55 | Clay Gerrard | set | messageid: <1472603695.41.0.452505929741.issue22233@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-08-31 00:34:55 | Clay Gerrard | link | issue22233 messages |
| 2016-08-31 00:34:54 | Clay Gerrard | create | |