Message273996
| Author | kevinconway |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gvanrossum, kevinconway, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2016-08-31.04:09:26 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1472616567.5.0.142662854771.issue27906@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I've added a unit test to the patch that asserts sock.accept() is called the appropriate number of times. Worth a note, I had to adjust one of the existing tests to account for the new backlog argument. There is a default value for the argument to preserve backwards compat for any callers, but the mock used in the test was not tolerant of having an extra arg available. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-08-31 04:09:27 | kevinconway | set | recipients: + kevinconway, gvanrossum, vstinner, yselivanov |
| 2016-08-31 04:09:27 | kevinconway | set | messageid: <1472616567.5.0.142662854771.issue27906@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-08-31 04:09:27 | kevinconway | link | issue27906 messages |
| 2016-08-31 04:09:27 | kevinconway | create | |