Message276592
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gvanrossum, kevinconway, python-dev, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2016-09-15.19:04:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAMpsgwZ6wZihSpknK+EJh_MJsdCrWZBSqCXNX8AfJcM25hoyuA@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <20160915181536.7891.98821.332D72C5@psf.io> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Guido van Rossum: "Maybe with the new code it could log a message if it doesn't exit the loop via a break? Because that would mean the listen buffer is full. It would encourage people to configure a larger number." Hum, yes maybe. But I would suggest to only log a maximum message per server, not start filling logs with the same message if the server is stressed. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-09-15 19:04:30 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, gvanrossum, python-dev, yselivanov, kevinconway |
| 2016-09-15 19:04:30 | vstinner | link | issue27906 messages |
| 2016-09-15 19:04:29 | vstinner | create | |