Message276698
| Author | eric.smith |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Tim.Graham, abarry, brett.cannon, eric.smith, martin.panter, ncoghlan, ned.deily, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, yan12125, yselivanov |
| Date | 2016-09-16.11:35:15 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1474025715.56.0.508269116061.issue28128@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Couldn't we create a private version of PyUnicode_DecodeUnicodeEscape, to be called by ast.c, which passes back invalid escape info? Then have the actual warning raised by ast.c, which knows enough about the context to generate a better error/warning. I think we'd only be able to report on he first error in a string, though, but I haven't thought it all the way through. I believe we'd only need to modify decode_unicode_with_escapes() in ast.c, which is called for both regular strings and f-string. And of course PyUnicode_DecodeUnicodeEscape would have to call the new private version and do the right thing. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-09-16 11:35:15 | eric.smith | set | recipients: + eric.smith, brett.cannon, rhettinger, ncoghlan, ned.deily, r.david.murray, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, Tim.Graham, yan12125, abarry |
| 2016-09-16 11:35:15 | eric.smith | set | messageid: <1474025715.56.0.508269116061.issue28128@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-09-16 11:35:15 | eric.smith | link | issue28128 messages |
| 2016-09-16 11:35:15 | eric.smith | create | |