Message277186
| Author | steven.daprano |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brett.cannon, fijall, lemburg, ned.deily, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-09-22.00:12:00 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <20160922001136.GW22471@ando.pearwood.info> |
| In-reply-to | <57E2D2EB.8080209@egenix.com> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I'd suggest to display all values and base the findings on > all available values, rather than just one: > min, max, avg, median, stddev. If we're going to go down that path, I suggest using something like: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-number_summary But at this point, we're surely looking at 3.7? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-09-22 00:12:01 | steven.daprano | set | recipients: + steven.daprano, lemburg, tim.peters, brett.cannon, pitrou, vstinner, ned.deily, fijall, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2016-09-22 00:12:00 | steven.daprano | link | issue28240 messages |
| 2016-09-22 00:12:00 | steven.daprano | create | |