Message278893
| Author | abarry |
|---|---|
| Recipients | abarry, matrixise, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2016-10-18.15:52:39 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1476805959.16.0.491261600062.issue28410@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I see the function is private; is there any concern with extending the PyErr_* API? I think it'd make sense to expose it, since it's a convenient way to do in C what can already be done easily in Python, but I don't actually have a good reason :) Other than this small nitpick, this LGTM. (Alternatively, we can keep it private for 3.6 and revise that decision for 3.7) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-10-18 15:52:39 | abarry | set | recipients: + abarry, ncoghlan, vstinner, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, matrixise |
| 2016-10-18 15:52:39 | abarry | set | messageid: <1476805959.16.0.491261600062.issue28410@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-10-18 15:52:39 | abarry | link | issue28410 messages |
| 2016-10-18 15:52:39 | abarry | create | |