Message280762
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | martin.panter, ncoghlan, njs, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2016-11-14.12:16:22 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1479125783.11.0.560804320887.issue28629@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Oops, I forgot to mention one other potential cost-minimisation strategy for a `co_cleanuptab` field: only populate it with setup/cleanup opcode pairs that include a yield, yield from, or await operation between them. The potential benefit I can see to *not* doing that is that if the information is always available (even on synchronous frames), then greenlet based frameworks like gevent may be able to make use of it. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-11-14 12:16:23 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, vstinner, njs, martin.panter, yselivanov |
| 2016-11-14 12:16:23 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1479125783.11.0.560804320887.issue28629@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-11-14 12:16:23 | ncoghlan | link | issue28629 messages |
| 2016-11-14 12:16:22 | ncoghlan | create | |